Search for: All records

Mélange (or block-in-matrix structures) exerts a first-order control on both the mechanical and chemical evolution of subduction megathrusts. However, the timing and mechanisms that form mélanges are variable and debated. Field observations and (micro-) structural analyses from a metasedimentary mélange in the lawsonite blueschist unit of the Catalina Schist (Santa Catalina Island, California, USA) reveal that syn-subduction deformation and fluid-mediated processes led to mélange formation at the plate interface. Deposited as turbidites, early shear occurred parallel to bedding planes (S1 foliation). At near peak subduction conditions, at the base of the subduction seismogenic zone (∼1.0 GPa, 320 °C), the rocks were intensely deformed in recumbent open to tight folds (F2) with axial planar cleavages (S2). Fracturing, fluid flow, and quartz precipitation are preserved as extensional vein mesh networks in fold noses. Continued shearing led to boudinage of these strengthened noses and transformation into strong blocks within the weaker less-veined matrix composed of high-strain fold limbs (S1−2). Microstructures reveal viscous deformation in the high-strain fold limbs occurred by pressure-solution creep of fine-grained quartz ± albite. In contrast, the fold noses and/or blocks contain coarse-grained quartz veins with little evidence of deformation. These rocks record the development of syn-subduction block-in-matrix mélange structures through the interaction of deformation and mineral precipitation; pressure solution weakened fold limbs-turned-matrix and veining strengthened fold noses-turned-blocks. Although mélange structure is often invoked to explain tremor and slow slip, rheological analysis indicates that these metasedimentary rocks can host tectonic creeping but cannot accommodate slow-slip strain rates by the deformation mechanisms preserved in their microstructures. 

Theory suggests the possibility for significant deviations between total pressure (or dynamic pressure) and lithostatic pressure during crustal metamorphism. If such deviations exist, the implications for orogenic reconstruction would be profound. Whether such non-lithostatic pressure conditions during crustal metamorphism are recorded and preserved in the rock record remains unresolved, as direct field evidence for this phenomenon is limited. Here, we investigate the Paleogene Tethyan Himalaya fold-thrust belt in Himachal Pradesh, northwestern India, which is the structurally highest part of the Himalayan orogen and deforms a ~10–15 km thick Neoproterozoic–Cretaceous passive margin stratigraphic section. Field-based kinematic studies demonstrate relatively moderate shortening strain across the Tethyan Himalaya. However, basal Tethyan strata consistently yield elevated pressure-temperature-time (P-T-t) estimates of 7–8 kbar and ~650°C, indicative of deep burial during Himalayan orogeny (ca. 20–45 Ma, 25–30 km depths). These P-T-t conditions can be reconciled by: (1) deep Cenozoic burial along cryptic structures and/or significant flattening of the Tethyan strata; (2) basal Tethyan strata recording metamorphism and deformation related to pre-Himalayan tectonism; or (3) non-lithostatic pressure conditions (i.e., tectonic overpressure). To test these models, we systematically mapped the Tethyan fold-thrust belt along the Pin Valley transect in northwestern India, a classic site for stratigraphic, paleontological, paleoenvironmental, and structural reconstructions. The Pin Valley region provides an opportunity to study a structurally continuous metamorphic field gradient from the near-surface to structural depths between 10–15 km, which should reflect P conditions ≤4 kbar if lithostatic. We integrate a multi-method approach combining detailed geologic mapping with quantitative analytical techniques (e.g., thermometry, finite strain analyses, thermo/geochronology, and thermobarometry) to quantify the magnitude, kinematics, thermal architecture, and timing of regional deformation, metamorphism, and subsequent exhumation. Results show: (1) throw on shortening structures is moderate to low (≤4 km); (2) temperature-depth relationships record a continuous, but regionally elevated, upper-crustal geothermal gradient of ≥40 °C/km, which is inconsistent with deep burial models (≤25 °C/km); (3) minimal flattening of basal Tethyan strata; (4) upper Tethyan strata yield pre-Himalayan low-temperature thermochronology dates, further refuting deep Cenozoic burial; and (5) basal Tethyan P-T-t estimates confirm elevated mid-crustal conditions of ~7 kbar, 630°C at 10–15 km depths during the Cenozoic. Preliminary volume expansion calculations are minimal; therefore, mechanisms involving non-hydrostatic thermodynamics, deviatoric stresses, rock strength contrasts, and tectonic mode switching are being explored.